Explanation sub-target:

For example, the event value online and the advertising media contacts online (editorial) should be considered

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Yes (including documentation) / No

Explanation indicator:

Explanation sub-target:

For the analysis, one should consider the number of broadcasters and broadcasting locations, the number of national and international TV hours, the advertising media contacts, the audience ratings and the visibility in hours of the host city, region and nation.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Yes (including documentation) / No

Explanation indicator:

Explanation sub-target:

For example, the number of digital views and online advertising media contacts should be considered.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Yes (including documentation) / No

Explanation indicator:

Explanation sub-target:

The share of public funding is presented transparently and the utilisation of funds is communicated.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Yes (incl. documentation) / No

Explanation indicator:

Explanation sub-target:

Relevant financial risks can include low ticket sales, weather-related cancellations, injuries to athletes, reputational damage or loss of sponsors.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Yes (including documentation) / No

Explanation indicator:

Explanation sub-target:

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Number and type of measures

Explanation indicator:

The "type of measure" indicator is a qualitative description of the measure (e.g. what was actually implemented? Have all main risks been addressed? What could be improved in the future?)

Explanation sub-target:

Monitoring can take place on a daily, monthly, quarterly or half-yearly basis, for example.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Yes (incl. documentation) / No

Explanation indicator:

Explanation sub-target:

Regular monitoring allows irregularities or deviations from expected cash flows, for example, to be identified at an early stage. This can indicate financial problems such as customer defaults or overspending that require immediate attention. Monitoring can take place on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Yes (incl. documentation) / No

Explanation indicator:

Explanation sub-target:

Explanation of importance: Monitoring can take place on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Yes (incl. documentation) / No

Explanation indicator:

Explanation sub-target:

Liquidity levels indicate whether an organiser can fulfil its short-term payment obligations.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Liquidity level 1. Liquidity level 2. Liquidity level 3.

Explanation indicator:

The period under review includes all phases of event planning. Monitoring can take place on a weekly, monthly, quarterly or half-yearly basis. The following guideline values are recommended for sustainable action: Liquidity level 1: 10–30 % Liquidi

Explanation sub-target:

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Percentage of (partial) budget utilisation at the various points in time

Explanation indicator:

The period under review includes all phases of event planning. Monitoring can take place on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.

Explanation sub-target:

Innovations can be products and services, e.g. pioneering projects relating to innovative means of transport.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Number and type of innovations to achieve the sustainability targets

Explanation indicator:

The indicator “Type of innovation” refers to a qualitative description of the innovation (e.g., What was actually implemented? What impact could be achieved in terms of sustainability? Can the innovation be applied to other sporting events or areas? What

Explanation sub-target:

Costs are the volume of innovation and benefits the utilisation in relation to sustainability targets, among other things. The degree of innovation can be determined by assessing the degree of novelty of the idea and the speed of diffusion of the idea.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Yes (including documentation / No)

Explanation indicator:

For documentation purposes, it is recommended that the total expenditure on research and development be stated in EUR.

Explanation sub-target:

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Number and type of collaborations with start-ups

Explanation indicator:

The indicator “Type of collaboration” refers to a qualitative description of the collaboration (e.g., What was actually implemented? What impact could be achieved in terms of sustainability? What could be improved in the future?)

Explanation sub-target:

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Number, type and scope of digitisation measures

Explanation indicator:

Digitalisation measures also include communication measures. The measures should be checked before implementation to see whether they really represent a more sustainable (e.g. emission-reducing) alternative. The indicator “Type of measure” refers to a q

Explanation sub-target:

Measures for digital collaboration include, for example, the implementation of an EMS platform to ensure efficiency and reduce resources.

Recommended target value:

Indicator:

Number and type of measures for digital collaboration in the organising committee

Explanation indicator:

The "type of measure" indicator is a qualitative description of the measure (e.g. what was actually implemented? How effective was the measure? What could be improved in the future?)

Explanation sub-target:

The organiser should define a separate, event-specific value for X.

Recommended target value:

A target value for sustainable action of 70 percent is recommended.

Indicator:

Satisfaction score: Percentage of users who are satisfied with the user-friendliness in relation to all users

Explanation indicator:

It is recommended to use a survey with a 5-point Likert scale. Users who state that they are very satisfied or satisfied are categorised as satisfied. It is recommended to subdivide the indicator into type of digitisation measure.